Mind Altering Reality

Mind Reality

Top speed on low or high flow of information would slow the new rules blocked Internet traffic according to rules that prohibit from the early days of the telephone company. Wheeler has tried to allay the fears of the broadband service provider. He said that the FCC proposal of certain provisions of title excludes II, stating that it doesn't make sense for the Internet. All this is possible in promoting investment in broadband networks, it was said in the article. To ensure incentives for broadband services are the band of traders at investment in their networks and my proposal, title II, to renew, to provide, in preparation for the 21st century that is need to build competitive networks. The exception is that the FCC is not in a position to establish prices for ISPs or tariffs. You mention not the separation of the last mile. This would have required ISPs, its lines to customers with competitors offers competitive Internet services to share. He spoke of the wireless industry as an example of how this might actually work. Mobile voice telephony services are subject to the provisions of title II. Over the last 21 years, the mobile industry has invested almost $300 billion under similar rules, which proves that regulation can promote investment and competition, the updated title II, he said. Proposal for wireless data for the monitoring of title II Wheeler added. It is a comparison of the FCC took in 2010, which does not fully apply to wireless networks. The only rule that is applied so that the established Wi-Fi needed in the management of the networks be transparent. Rule of law non-blocking does not apply to wireless networks. In an interview with journalists, a senior official of the FCC, said that more than half of Americans now accessing the Internet through mobile devices. For this reason, Wheeler believes that you must apply the same rules as for the free Internet access to connect to a wireless cable network. This means that wireless services stop a momentum of its own that block similar companies or to charge companies for a faster connection to your customers. Wireless can bear not 55 per cent of Internet traffic and hope, by the requirements of the open Internet, said in an interview with CNET in January are excluded. Wireless companies have been affected drawn through these rules apply for their networks from these networks depend, to deliver a limited number of wireless frequencies for their goods. They argue that the wireless networks the same according to the standards, that cable Internet connections, which have much more space, it could cripple wireless services. FCC indicated that they are aware of this problem and understand who the technical differences between the two types of networks. In an attempt to reassure activity of wireless services, which have their networks not under the burdensome requirements will collapse, said that they will allow you the reasonable network management regulations. So that wireless operators manage traffic in the network should alleviate the problems who fear companies. All cell phone companies are against these measures. Sprint has taken mind altering reality a cautious tone support. Sprint continues to believe that a regulatory system is light is not wrong, to make investments in broadband service, the company in a statement. Sprint rules however suggested to check to confirm that give carriers enough flexibility to manage their networks and differentiated product range and prices, so that the regular competition for the market. . The power of the FCC, the so-called interconnection Zusammenschaltungs-or paid jobs to rules give the new rules, if adopted, for the first time. Here is the relationship between such as Comcast broadband providers and Internet backbone providers like level 3 or cogent, provides Internet content networks broadband business, the Internet, like Netflix. Netflix and companies that are content-streaming, sometimes need to pay providers of broadband capacity on their networks. In the past, there were disputes about this agreement. Last year, Netflix has accused, Comcast and Verizon intentionally slowing down the traffic of Netflix, the company for access to the broadband customers pay to enforce. According to the new rules of the open Internet, the reclassification of wide broadband as a title II, officials are empowered by the FCC service, to examine complaints about this type of disputes based on case by case basis. Netflix, who fought for the FCC to such a performance, welcomed the efforts. We support the Commission stating the jurisdiction over the network and the implementation of a procedure for the case that prevents Internet service providers that tolls, irrational and unjust, to pay, the spokesman for Netflix Anne Marie Squeo in the education sector said. They would have had in the past year follow-up process, it will certainly serve as hostage until we pay our members chose a handful of Internet service providers. 11 update. 40. Mr. A. pts: additional information provided by the FCC in the proposal, as well as information and comments from companies and trade groups. For more information about net neutrality and impact on consumers over the Internet and the United States NET, check fix, a special report by CNET, that takes an in-depth look at the topic. .